[162295] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rajiv Asati (rajiva))
Mon Apr 8 15:13:48 2013
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:13:11 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZ-Axcx7fDk4XZbyWaQU0oyheb+5JjTvVWYLdKC2zAxiw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Chris,
Ummm=8A you mean the IPv6 and IPv4 inter-dependency when you say IP
encumbered?
If so, the answer is Yes. v6 addressing doesn't need to change to
accommodate this IPv4 A+P encoding.
Cheers,
Rajiv
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 2:28 PM
To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva@cisco.com>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
>
>On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
><rajiva@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>Yes, MAP (T-Translation or E-Encap mode) is implemented on two regular
>routers that I know of - ASR9K and ASR1K. Without that, you are right that
>MAP wouldn't have been as beneficial as claimed.
>
>
>
>
>
>glad it's cross platform... is it also IP encumbered so it'll remain just
>as 'cross platform' ?
>
