[161561] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: routing table go boom
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Tue Mar 19 21:21:32 2013
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: "nanog@nanog.org Group" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 01:21:14 +0000
In-Reply-To: <5148FD5E.6010106@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mar 20, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Abstract nonsense.
No, it isn't.
The *actual* end-to-end principle states that whenever possible and wheneve=
r it makes sense, application-specific functionality ought to be incorporat=
ed into end-nodes rather than into intermediary systems. In the case of LI=
SP, it can be noted that either a) the end-to-end principle has no relevanc=
e, or b) LISP is closer to adherence to the end-to-end principle than the c=
urrent routing system.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
-- John Milton
