[161559] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: routing table go boom

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Tue Mar 19 20:06:25 2013

Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:05:50 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <E3734AB4-0F8F-4E0E-B265-51573453F689@arbor.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Dobbins, Roland wrote:

> It is always amusing to see people allude to the end-to-end
> principle to support their arguments, when in fact the
> end-to-end principle is either inapplicable to the topic
> at hand, or actually lends support to the opposite of their
> arguments.

Abstract nonsense.

> There are cogent arguments to be made against LISP and
> LISP-like systems.  But none of those arguments have
> been raised in this thread, so far.

Never ignore the following problem:

   Assuming that there are 4G mobile devices in the world, the
   mapping table has more than 4G entries each updated every
   minute or second.

						Masataka Ohta




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post