[161374] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: internet in the box
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Abley)
Sun Mar 10 15:11:30 2013
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <haa1yxhapf8lsoiq36hxidds.1362942122693@email.android.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:11:14 -0400
To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, "bross@pobox.com" <bross@pobox.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2013-03-10, at 15:02, Warren Bailey =
<wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
> I suspect the amount of fade glass will provide would make this a last =
resort solution. Unless you did a 900mhz point to point with some yagis.
I suspect the general answer is you do whatever you can to make things =
work.
> I can't think of a reason you would have to provide data, most people =
have 3/4g to begin with. If it's for booth ops, I would think that =
cellular router would be the best choice. Most of the times our booth =
rides our private satellite network, so we just deal with the latency. =
If you could live with 800ms rtt, get a vsat.. :)=20
The original question (IIRC) was how to provide conference-style wifi =
with no wired back-haul, so given that I presume that the option "don't =
provide conference-style wifi at all" does not meet the requirements :-)
Joe
