[161373] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: internet in the box
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Warren Bailey)
Sun Mar 10 15:02:24 2013
From: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>, "bross@pobox.com" <bross@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:02:05 +0000
In-Reply-To: <80F9C281-6102-4C22-AE43-B7DBD01A92A4@hopcount.ca>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I suspect the amount of fade glass will provide would make this a last reso=
rt solution. Unless you did a 900mhz point to point with some yagis. I can'=
t think of a reason you would have to provide data, most people have 3/4g t=
o begin with. If it's for booth ops, I would think that cellular router wou=
ld be the best choice. Most of the times our booth rides our private satell=
ite network, so we just deal with the latency. If you could live with 800ms=
rtt, get a vsat.. :)
From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
-------- Original message --------
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Date: 03/10/2013 11:43 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: bross@pobox.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: internet in the box
On 2013-03-10, at 14:35, bross@pobox.com wrote:
> I know nothing of the legalities outside of the US, however I never said =
anything about the convention center restricting irghts to use RF, I said t=
hey won't let you on the roof without paying a lot of money. I strongly su=
spect that is true of all convention centers everywhere.
It's not uncommon for people to circumvent these problems by pointing anten=
nas at windows from the inside. Can require some strategic room booking to =
get the right line of sight.
Joe
