[161232] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What Should an Engineer Address when 'Selling' IPv6 to Executives?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mukom Akong T.)
Tue Mar 5 14:23:47 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGSTjPGC8mK5Yqt5X1EjwhbFxRbGs0xZpGTqVHy4CDU-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Mukom Akong T." <mukom.tamon@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 23:22:54 +0400
To: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
> One of the most important things i see not being stressed enough is
> that IPv6 is frequently free or a low-cost incremental upgrade.
>
> So, when calculating ROI / NPV, the hurdle can be very low such that
> the cash in-flow / cost savings is not a huge factor since the
> required investment is close to nil.
>
The low hurdle advantage remains only if the organisation starts soon and
progresses incrementally. I suspect the longer v6 deployment is put off,
the more this advantage is eroded.
--=20
Mukom Akong T.
http://about.me/perfexcellence | twitter: @perfexcellent
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------------------------------------------------
=E2=80=9CWhen you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whisperin=
g of the
hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----------------------------------------------------------------
