[161231] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What Should an Engineer Address when 'Selling' IPv6 to Executives?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mukom Akong T.)
Tue Mar 5 14:20:15 2013
In-Reply-To: <20130305103544.77570b12.gem@rellim.com>
From: "Mukom Akong T." <mukom.tamon@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 23:19:21 +0400
To: "Gary E. Miller" <gem@rellim.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Gary E. Miller <gem@rellim.com> wrote:
> You missed the most important one. Many people now include IPv6 as
> a mandatory RFQ item. If you don't support it your customers will
> be fewer and fewer.
>
I did mention it under the last but one paragraph of section [a]. Even
though I only mentioned it for gov't contracts as I think those are the fat
juicy ones. But yes, I do agree about the fact that non-compliance could
mean you lose some business today.
Regards
--=20
Mukom Akong T.
http://about.me/perfexcellence | twitter: @perfexcellent
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------------------------------------------------
=E2=80=9CWhen you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whisperin=
g of the
hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----------------------------------------------------------------
