[160936] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (calin.chiorean)
Wed Feb 20 10:17:37 2013
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:10:55 +0100
From: "calin.chiorean" <calin.chiorean@secdisk.net>
To: <surfer@mauigateway.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130220000235.87B48FE5@m0005297.ppops.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
If I didn't miss any part of the report, no *nix is mentioned.
I'm a *nix fan, but why they (when I say they, I mean an attacker, not necessary the one in this document) should complicate their life, when all tools are available for windows os, you just have to compile them.
Cheers,
Calin
---- On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:02:35 +0100 Scott Weeks wrote ----
>
>
>
>Be sure to read the source:
>
>intelreport.mandiant.com/Mandiant_APT1_Report.pdf
>
>I'm only part way through, but I find it hard to believe that
>only micro$loth computers are used as the attack OS. Maybe I
>haven't gotten far enough through report to find the part
>where they use the *nix boxes?
>
>scott
>
>
