[160933] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Weeks)
Wed Feb 20 04:09:09 2013
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:08:57 -0800
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: surfer@mauigateway.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--- calin.chiorean@secdisk.net wrote:
From: "calin.chiorean" <calin.chiorean@secdisk.net>
It was just an example :-) to point out the scale of developers
vs operators.
--------------------------------------------
:: You'd be surprised at how much better brains are than brawn
:: on these things... ;-)
--- wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
Have you been to The Great Wall? That statement does not apply
in the PRC.
----------------------------------------------------
It would be interesting, I suppose, to see what can massively
parallel better. brains or brawn :) That's what I'm saying.
If this is done by m$ toolage only, as the report seems to
say, on page 4, for example:
"817 of the 832 (98%) IP addresses logging into APT1 controlled
systems using Remote Desktop resolved back to China."
Then they have missed the more interesting part of the puzzle,
I believe.
scott
ps. If you gottem both, well that's a whole other thingie.
