[160787] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Wed Feb 13 08:51:57 2013
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:50:17 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: Scott Helms <khelms@zcorum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMrdfRwjwLkhVF_gaNH5upPdDK-o00+YT+2Fp=z2fzO_QkW7sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Scott Helms wrote:
> Masataka,
>
> Using the UK as a model for US and Canadian deployments is a fallacy.
May or may not be.
But, what???? "Using the UK as a model for US and Canadian
deployments"!!!!!?????
I'm afraid it's not me but you to have done so.
So?
Who are you arguing against?
> You may be a brilliant conversationalist in Japanese, but
> you're not making a convincing argument in English and simply
> railing that your position is correct without regard to
> countering information isn't going to convince anyone.
If you feel so, it merely means that your ability to understand
English is a lot worse than mine.
Sorry, but, it is your problem.
> Keep on this track and you're just going to be ignored by
> most people on the list.
I'm afraid it is also your problem to be suffered by you.
Masataka Ohta
