[160773] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Tue Feb 12 18:05:08 2013
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:03:44 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: Jason Baugher <jason@thebaughers.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGbD49q+07Gt6Sb=TKWWFKb5K2wGou89bsvNVjM7L5Zpz5N80A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Jason Baugher wrote:
> Scott, I've been down this road with Masataka. over the last few days. I
> gave up.
You have lost instantly, because you insisted on 32:1, which
makes expensive PON even more expensive.
It's stupid to insist on 32:1 to have 6 trunk fibers and 31 drop
fibers within a cable for 192 subscribers, because with 8:1, you
only need 24 trunk fibers and 7 drop fibers.
Your theory is not consistent with the reality.
Masataka Ohta
