[160317] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fletcher Kittredge)
Sun Feb 3 19:18:11 2013
In-Reply-To: <001a01ce00ce$6d230e40$47692ac0$@iname.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:17:57 -0500
From: Fletcher Kittredge <fkittred@gwi.net>
To: "Frank Bulk (iname.com)" <frnkblk@iname.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Frank Bulk (iname.com) <frnkblk@iname.com>wrote:
> Fletcher:
>
> Many rural LECs are homerunning their fiber back to the CO, such that the
> optical splitters are only in the CO. It gives them one management point,
> the highest possible efficiency (you can maximize any every splitter and
> therefore PON) and a pathway to ActiveE.
>
Frank;
That is the architecture I am familar with. I would like to get a sense
of how wide-spread its adoption is.
regards,
Fletcher
--
Fletcher Kittredge
GWI
8 Pomerleau Street
Biddeford, ME 04005-9457
207-602-1134
