[160229] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Fwd: Rollup: Small City Municipal Broadband
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Helms)
Sat Feb 2 17:47:48 2013
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.02.1302021722570.492@brugal.local>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 17:47:37 -0500
From: Scott Helms <khelms@zcorum.com>
To: Brandon Ross <bross@pobox.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
That's one of the reasons to look at active ethernet over gpon. There is
much more of a chance to do v6 on that gear, especially cisco's Metro
ethernet switches.
On Feb 2, 2013 5:27 PM, "Brandon Ross" <bross@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2013, Scott Helms wrote:
>
> I'd also talk with Zhone, Allied Telesys, Adtran, and Cisco if for no
>> other reason but get the best pricing you can.
>>
>
> I can't believe I'm going to beat Owen to this point, but considering you
> a building a brand new infrastructure, I'd hope you'd support your service
> provider's stakeholders if they want to do IPv6. To do so securely, you'll
> want your neutral layer 2 infrastrcuture to at least support RA-guard and
> DHCPv6 shield. You might also want/need DHCPv6 PD snooping, MLD snooping.
> We have found VERY disappointing support for these features in this type
> of gear.
>
> --
> Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM:
> BrandonNRoss
> +1-404-635-6667 ICQ:
> 2269442
> Schedule a meeting: https://doodle.com/bross Skype:
> brandonross
>
