[160086] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Baugher)
Wed Jan 30 23:43:54 2013
In-Reply-To: <6337839.4423.1359606246568.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:43:41 -0600
From: Jason Baugher <jason@thebaughers.com>
To: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Working in a mixed TDM and IP world, it's such a stark difference between
freely available RFCs and $900 per pop Telcordia docs.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jason Baugher" <jason@thebaughers.com>
>
> > I can't vouch for these yet, since I haven't used one so far.
> >
> http://www.calix.com/systems/p-series/calix_residential_services_gateways.html
>
> Yeah; see my other reply a few minutes ago.
>
> > It looks to be a Broadband Forum spec,
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR-069.
> > I'm not using it yet either, but find it interesting.
>
> I see that it is, and I'm frankly *amazed* that it's gotten industry
> uptake to the point people will quote it on ticklists. Probably, everyone
> *else* thinks it's a bellcore standard, like I did. :-)
>
> Can't wait for Telcordia to try to sue them over the prefix.
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
> jra@baylink.com
> Designer The Things I Think RFC
> 2100
> Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land
> Rover DII
> St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647
> 1274
>
>
