[160084] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Wed Jan 30 23:24:20 2013
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:24:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAGbD49qDmBsdNJtc2D2ObEGPaosoedz1OVMVTD0B0QrMptuJBw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Baugher" <jason@thebaughers.com>
> I can't vouch for these yet, since I haven't used one so far.
> http://www.calix.com/systems/p-series/calix_residential_services_gateways.html
Yeah; see my other reply a few minutes ago.
> It looks to be a Broadband Forum spec,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TR-069.
> I'm not using it yet either, but find it interesting.
I see that it is, and I'm frankly *amazed* that it's gotten industry
uptake to the point people will quote it on ticklists. Probably, everyone
*else* thinks it's a bellcore standard, like I did. :-)
Can't wait for Telcordia to try to sue them over the prefix.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
