[159661] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Slashdot: UK ISP PlusNet Testing Carrier-Grade NAT Instead of IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Thu Jan 17 09:55:08 2013
In-Reply-To: <CACg3zYF65y2kHi18N2AZEzbvARExYCuBznCGA8KiPyTsDz+3Xw@mail.gmail.com>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:54:37 -0500
To: "." <oscar.vives@gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:06 AM, . <oscar.vives@gmail.com> wrote:
> The people on this list have a influence in how the Internet run, hope
> somebody smart can figure how we can avoid going there, because there
> is frustrating and unfun.
"Free network-based firewall to be installed next month. OPT OUT HERE
if you don't want it."
It's not a hard problem. There are yet plenty of IPv4 addresses to go
around for all the people who actually care whether or not they're
behind a NAT.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
