[159174] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Netflix transit preference?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Dodd)
Thu Dec 27 14:14:04 2012
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:39:14 -0700
In-Reply-To: <50DC946E.7000600@utc.edu>
From: Steve Dodd <steve.dodd@vision.net>
To: 'Jeff Kell' <jeff-kell@utc.edu>, "'Patrick W. Gilmore'" <patrick@ianai.net>
Cc: 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Perhaps you could get some subset of RMIX to approach Netflix collectively.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Kell [mailto:jeff-kell@utc.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 11:33 AM
To: Patrick W. Gilmore
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Netflix transit preference?
On 12/27/2012 1:26 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:19 , randal k <nanog@data102.com> wrote:
>
>> (We move ~1.4gbps to Netflix, and are thus not a candidate for
>> peering. And they have no POP close.)
> Why don't you ask Netflix? And why not ask them for kit to put on-net?
> <https://signup.netflix.com/openconnect>
The last time we asked, their criteria was ~2.0gbps, so he doesn't have enough qualifying traffic.
Has anyone looked at a Qwilt? http://www.qwilt.com/
Jeff
