[158395] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Thu Nov 29 14:07:01 2012
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGXKgxFg_zkA7J5d+0pR1nEyCnBHd-N7ppDOmm0rVgrECQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:06:19 -0500
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Nov 29, 2012, at 13:57 , William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote:
> =08On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore =
<patrick@ianai.net> wrote:
>> Do you think if the police found out child pr0n was
>> being served from a starbux they wouldn't
>> confiscate the equipment from that store?
>=20
> I think if they took the cash registers too the Starbucks lawyer would
> be in court an hour later with a motion to quash in one hand and an
> offer of full cooperation in the other.
And if the sky were orange....
Any other non-sequitors? :)
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
P.S. I can come up with some examples where the cash registers would be =
fair game, such as when the manager was charging the hosting provider =
extra to sit in the corner and host the 'bad content'. But it is still =
a non-sequitor w/r/t this thread.
