[158240] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Mon Nov 26 20:01:35 2012
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 01:01:14 +0000
In-Reply-To: <50B40F23.6080900@mtcc.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Nov 27, 2012, at 7:53 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> If they don't commit, the game of chicken continues.
Right - so, what new capabilities/economies of scale/essential conveniences=
are made possible by IPv6 but not IPv4, pour encourager les autres?
This is not a rhetorical question. I believe it is a very relevant questio=
n that most of those who have the most pecuniary interests in ubiquitous IP=
v6 deployment are not even considering.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
-- John Milton
