[158055] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Nov 20 10:28:56 2012
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <85895738-B721-409D-ADEC-8620FBCB8B63@steffann.nl>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 07:24:30 -0800
To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Nov 20, 2012, at 7:06 AM, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
>> So, I assume 6in4 tunnels like HE.net are included in the "native" =
percentage?
>=20
> As the traffic is delivered as native traffic to Google I don't think =
Google can even see that there is a tunnel between them and the user. =
They might see a lower MTU, but to Google the traffic is native IPv6.
>=20
> - Sander
>=20
That's only really true of the 6in4 (tunnel broker) tunnels. The 6to4 =
traffic that comes through our 6to4 or any other 6to4 gateways, OTOH, =
will have 2002::/16 addresses which makes it just as obvious as Teredo.
Owen
