[158054] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Nov 20 10:26:15 2012
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD_uLpN76w-26nssD0iietrKQ_V47JXDnXG9CA3ZAH=oLhE94Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 07:23:34 -0800
To: Oliver Garraux <oliver@g.garraux.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
6to4 tunnels, no. 6in4 (such as tunnel broker), yes, those are part of =
the native count.
Owen
On Nov 20, 2012, at 6:57 AM, Oliver Garraux <oliver@g.garraux.net> =
wrote:
> So, I assume 6in4 tunnels like HE.net are included in the "native" =
percentage?
>=20
> Oliver
>=20
> -------------------------------------
>=20
> Oliver Garraux
> Check out my blog: www.GetSimpliciti.com/blog
> Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux
>=20
>=20
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:02 AM, William F. Maton Sotomayor
> <wmaton@ottix.net> wrote:
>>=20
>> APNIC labs have an interesting set of numbers on IPv6 uptake as well.
>>=20
>> http://labs.apnic.net/measureipv6/
>>=20
>>=20
>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>=20
>>> It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low =
for a
>>> number
>>> of reasons.
>>>=20
>>> Owen
>>>=20
>>> On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce <aaron.toponce@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very =
first
>>>>> time when native IPv6 on google statistics
>>>>> (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. =
Some
>>>>> might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying =
IPv6 :-)
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> And given the rate on that graph, we'll hit 2% before year-end =
2013.
>>>>=20
>>>> --
>>>> . o . o . o . . o o . . . o .
>>>> . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o
>>>> o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>=20
>> wfms
>>=20
