[157951] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: "authority" to route?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard Barnes)
Fri Nov 16 14:44:38 2012
In-Reply-To: <18067.1353088513@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:44:22 -0500
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I think Heather was pointing out that this would be a good time to actually
use it.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:05:39 -0800, Kyle Creyts said:
> > Jeez, isn't RPKI supposed to solve this problem?
>
> That would presume the existence of a deployed system that
> everybody actually used.
>
