[157949] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: "authority" to route?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Nov 16 12:56:48 2012
To: Kyle Creyts <kyle.creyts@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:05:39 -0800."
<CA+TcGd9BGCiiz8LbF1K9yjnqFMGb+7eVUA3rq-DRrShZezPH8A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:55:13 -0500
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1353088513_1956P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:05:39 -0800, Kyle Creyts said:
> Jeez, isn't RPKI supposed to solve this problem?
That would presume the existence of a deployed system that
everybody actually used.
--==_Exmh_1353088513_1956P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=m6P9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1353088513_1956P--
