[157767] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Indonesian ISP Moratel announces Google's prefixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Wed Nov 7 00:30:36 2012
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:30:18 +0200
To: Jian Gu <guxiaojian@gmail.com>,Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com>
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il>
In-Reply-To: <CAAxc0wUioEq_qseQgkH6d3gAQ=+bLOFBjuwtHz6s=aTauBCD2Q@mail.g
mail.com>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
At 20:48 06/11/2012 -0800, Jian Gu wrote:
Ahhh...blame the victim. Google - shame on you.
-Hank
>What do you mean hijack? Google is peering with Moratel, if Google does not
>want Moratel to advertise its routes to Moratel's peers/upstreams, then
>Google should've set the correct BGP attributes in the first place.
>
>On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com> wrote:
>
> > Another case of route hijack -
> > http://blog.cloudflare.com/why-google-went-offline-today-and-a-bit-about
> >
> >
> >
> > I am curious if big networks have any pre-defined filters for big content
> > providers like Google to avoid these? I am sure internet community would be
> > working in direction to somehow prevent these issues. Curious to know
> > developments so far.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Anurag Bhatia
> > anuragbhatia.com
> >
> > Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> |
> > Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>|
> > Google+ <https://plus.google.com/118280168625121532854>
> >
