[157757] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Indonesian ISP Moratel announces Google's prefixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jian Gu)
Tue Nov 6 23:49:10 2012
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0+aXYK02EPw89dT2FO5r_HWX2ta5itTjMiYSwJ9Uh1+fMOyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 20:48:55 -0800
From: Jian Gu <guxiaojian@gmail.com>
To: Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
What do you mean hijack? Google is peering with Moratel, if Google does not
want Moratel to advertise its routes to Moratel's peers/upstreams, then
Google should've set the correct BGP attributes in the first place.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com> wrote:
> Another case of route hijack -
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/why-google-went-offline-today-and-a-bit-about
>
>
>
> I am curious if big networks have any pre-defined filters for big content
> providers like Google to avoid these? I am sure internet community would be
> working in direction to somehow prevent these issues. Curious to know
> developments so far.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
>
> Anurag Bhatia
> anuragbhatia.com
>
> Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> |
> Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>|
> Google+ <https://plus.google.com/118280168625121532854>
>
