[157348] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 100.100.0.0/24
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Tue Oct 16 06:44:21 2012
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:44:04 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: "Lowe, Richard B" <Richard.B.Lowe@centurylink.com>
In-Reply-To: <51F66CF419EDB149A49AA5401CD2E246BB3FF1@podcwmbxex506.ctl.intranet>
Cc: "'nanog@nanog.org'" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 16/10/2012 11:37, Lowe, Richard B wrote:
> Kind of like the 192.0.2.1/32 for IPv4, huh?
no - 192.0.2.0/24 is formally "TEST-NET-1, documentation and examples",
like 2001:db8::/32.
100::/64 is specifically for discard and analysis style RTBHs. I.e. for
ipv6, you can now keep your documentation prefixes on your documentation.
Nick
> RFC: 5635
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:nick@foobar.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 6:40 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: 100.100.0.0/24
>
> On 07/10/2012 00:34, Randy Bush wrote:
>> ipv6 route 2001:DB8:0:DEAD:BEEF::1/128 Null0
>
> plug: rfc 6666.
>
> 100::/64 is reserved for this purpose.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
