[157347] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Cantrell)
Tue Oct 16 06:38:58 2012

Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:38:43 +0100
From: David Cantrell <david@cantrell.org.uk>
To: Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO0-hXYZGbsz8GxL6BgPWT52n7-n=6RLk6_UEg47xH6+XaWu8w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:00:56AM -0700, Joe Hamelin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Roy <r.engehausen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Why not give them wireless Internet access only?  That will keep all the
> > smartphone users happy.
> Maybe because he has 130 sites and 130 truck rolls is not cheap.  Also
> company policy says no.

So stick a pre-configured device in the post, with instructions on how
and where to plug it in.

-- 
David Cantrell | top google result for "topless karaoke murders"

  "Cynical" is a word used by the naive to describe the experienced.
      George Hills, in uknot


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post