[157336] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: If you are using APNIC as an RPKI trust anchor,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Michaelson)
Mon Oct 15 21:23:37 2012
From: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <C2F6B5AE-907D-4F45-A48F-BE8B10BBA70F@virtualized.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:23:24 +1000
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 16/10/2012, at 11:09 AM, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
> George,
>=20
> On Oct 15, 2012, at 8:44 PM, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> =
wrote:
>> Once there is a global trust anchor, you can validate the 5 APNIC =
operating
>> CA under a single root, single TAL. Until then, an APNIC TAL is =
necessary.
>=20
> So, just to be clear, the lack of a single TAL is due to inaction on =
the part of ICANN?
>=20
> Thanks,
> -drc
>=20
No David, no implication was intended that this is due to inaction on =
the part of ICANN.=20
Sometimes, these things just take time.
cheers
-George=
