[157340] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: If you are using APNIC as an RPKI trust anchor,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Mitchell)
Mon Oct 15 22:55:47 2012
In-Reply-To: <m2391fi2gr.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Jay Mitchell <jay@miscreant.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:55:24 +1100
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Perhaps the following?
AfriNIC
ARIN
APNIC
LACNIC
RIPE
Regards,
Jay
On 16/10/2012, at 1:18 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>> ok. i'll bite. what the heck is this meant to support? i thought the
>>> rirs were moving from five TALs to one.
>>
>> Randy, we have an operational need to separate the existing single TAL
>> into its discrete components for each source, so we can have production
>> certificates for each source, so that we can ultimately have them signed
>> under their appropriate parent registry,
>
> ok, i'll give. what are the five 'sources'?
>
> randy
>
