[157237] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jo Rhett)
Thu Oct 11 17:34:02 2012
From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com>
In-Reply-To: <656144913.331763.1349990917569.JavaMail.root@network1.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:33:40 -0700
To: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Oct 11, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> so there really is no drawback from getting the /44, and having enough =
space to not have to worry about it in the future.
It's only a worry if you can only route /48s, which was my question. And =
seriously, we're going to be banging around in the emptiness as compared =
to our IPv4 allocations. :)
--=20
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet =
projects.
