[156394] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv6 Ignorance

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Bool)
Mon Sep 17 11:24:22 2012

From: Adrian Bool <aid@logic.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <983a8fe30c5d07c11a5a52ce2cb8f4e8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:23:18 +0100
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


Hi Mike,

On 17 Sep 2012, at 16:04, Mike Simkins <mike.simkins@sungard.com> wrote:
> RIPE 552 (I think), allows you to request up to a /29 without =
additional
> justification if needed.

Sure, but you're just tinkering at the edges here.

32-bits would be a more sensible allocation size to LIRs, allowing them =
construct their addressing plan in a logical, hierarchal manner whilst =
allowing for growth - and most importantly ensuring they only advertise =
a single route into the global routing table.

Kind regards,

Adrian







home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post