[156393] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv6 Ignorance

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Mon Sep 17 11:19:49 2012

Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:18:52 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <50571759.5050704@illuminati.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On 9/17/2012 5:28 AM, John Mitchell wrote:
> I think people forget how humongous the v6 space is...
>
> Remember that the address space is 2^128 (or 
> 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 addresses) to put 
> the in perspective (and a great sample that explained to me how large 
> it was, you will still get 667 quadrillion address per square 
> millimetre of the Earth’s Surface.

Yes. But figure an average subnet has, what, maybe 5 hosts on it? (Sure, 
there's some bigger ones, but a whole lot of "my router, my PC, and 
maybe my printer" networks too.

So even if you could use all the top bits (which you can't, as many 
combinations are reserved), that's more like 92,233,720,368,547,758,080. 
And if you lop off the top three bits and just count the space currently 
assigned to Global Unicast, that's 11,529,215,046,068,469,760. Which is 
0.02 per square mm of the earth's surface. Or just over 2 per square 
centimeter.

Powers of two get big fast... but they get small fast too.

Matthew Kaufman


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post