[156128] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Sep 7 02:39:15 2012
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <50499480.8050405@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 23:35:24 -0700
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sep 6, 2012, at 23:30 , Masataka Ohta =
<mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>=20
>>> the DNS and won't discover anything about the DNS that can't be had
>>> via getaddrinfo() until long after its too late redefine the =
protocol
>>> in terms of seeking SRV records.
>>=20
>> Oh, sure, I get that. One of the problems I've had with the "end to
>> end NAT" argument is exactly that I can't see how it's any more
>> deployable than IPv6, for exactly this reason.
>=20
> The easiest part of the deployment is to modify end systems.
>=20
Then why is IPv6 deployment happening faster in the internet core than
at the edge?
The real world seems to defy your claims.
Owen
