[154994] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Grant Ridder)
Wed Jul 18 21:52:57 2012
In-Reply-To: <CALOgxGbnouMkZB5HTpr=qvy9v6UbvVpPjmnD6D87=3UTqVvmLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:52:22 -0500
From: Grant Ridder <shortdudey123@gmail.com>
To: "trejrco@gmail.com" <trejrco@gmail.com>
Cc: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I am on sprint and my ip is always in the 20. net even though my wan up is
totally different.
Grant
On Wednesday, July 18, 2012, TJ wrote:
> Even if they did OK it (which i doubt), actually using it - especially in a
> public/customer facing / visible deployment - is a Bad Idea.
> *Traceability fail and possibly creating unreachable networks out there
> ...*
>
> /TJ
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Andrey Khomyakov <
> khomyakov.andrey@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > So some "comments" on the intertubes claim that DoD ok'd use of it's
> > unadvertized space on private networks. Is there any official reference
> > that may support this statement that anyone of you have seen out there?
> >
> > --Andrey
> >
>
