[154993] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TJ)
Wed Jul 18 21:37:01 2012
In-Reply-To: <CAB31LOMLGT97fTRD++f2F5ZgMLgKhDJ5Mu2GAPY82oYCg+7Xxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: TJ <trejrco@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:35:59 -0400
To: Andrey Khomyakov <khomyakov.andrey@gmail.com>
Cc: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: trejrco@gmail.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Even if they did OK it (which i doubt), actually using it - especially in a
public/customer facing / visible deployment - is a Bad Idea.
*Traceability fail and possibly creating unreachable networks out there ...*
/TJ
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Andrey Khomyakov <
khomyakov.andrey@gmail.com> wrote:
> So some "comments" on the intertubes claim that DoD ok'd use of it's
> unadvertized space on private networks. Is there any official reference
> that may support this statement that anyone of you have seen out there?
>
> --Andrey
>
