[154599] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco Update
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Fri Jul 6 03:56:16 2012
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:54:09 +0300
To: goemon@anime.net,Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1207060027560.12882@sasami.anime.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
At 00:28 06/07/2012 -0700, goemon@anime.net wrote:
>"We take responsibility for that lack of clarity, and we are taking steps
>to make this right."
>
>including firing the idiot responsible?
The Nussbacher axiom of management - "Management is like a cesspool - the
really big chunks float to the top". I would assume the person responsible
will one day be running Cisco.
-Hank
>-Dan
>
>On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>
>>In Cisco's defense, perhaps the legalese did not fully communicate the
>>intent of the service.
>>
>>http://blogs.cisco.com/home/update-answering-our-customers-questions-about-cisco-connect-cloud-2/
>>
>>CB
>>
>>On Jul 5, 2012 8:52 AM, "Mario Eirea" <meirea@charterschoolit.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Has anyone seen this yet? Looks like Cisco was forcing people to join its
>>Cloud service through an update for it's consumer level routers.
>>>
>>http://www.neowin.net/news/cisco-locks-users-out-of-their-routers-requires-invasive-cloud-service
>>>
>>>-Mario Eirea
