[154597] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco Update
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (goemon@anime.net)
Fri Jul 6 03:29:25 2012
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 00:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: goemon@anime.net
To: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGRBbF1_OXoOiDA3Lix5QOAKcH5on+wAw5Cj+VMdmYFV+w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
"We take responsibility for that lack of clarity, and we are taking steps
to make this right."
including firing the idiot responsible?
-Dan
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> In Cisco's defense, perhaps the legalese did not fully communicate the
> intent of the service.
>
> http://blogs.cisco.com/home/update-answering-our-customers-questions-about-cisco-connect-cloud-2/
>
> CB
>
> On Jul 5, 2012 8:52 AM, "Mario Eirea" <meirea@charterschoolit.com> wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone seen this yet? Looks like Cisco was forcing people to join its
> Cloud service through an update for it's consumer level routers.
>>
>>
> http://www.neowin.net/news/cisco-locks-users-out-of-their-routers-requires-invasive-cloud-service
>>
>> -Mario Eirea
>
