[154590] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco Update
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cameron Byrne)
Fri Jul 6 01:13:42 2012
In-Reply-To: <24E0AC20-73D9-4E53-B5F3-86F46E0A03D5@charterschoolit.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:13:07 -0700
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Mario Eirea <meirea@charterschoolit.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In Cisco's defense, perhaps the legalese did not fully communicate the
intent of the service.
http://blogs.cisco.com/home/update-answering-our-customers-questions-about-cisco-connect-cloud-2/
CB
On Jul 5, 2012 8:52 AM, "Mario Eirea" <meirea@charterschoolit.com> wrote:
>
> Has anyone seen this yet? Looks like Cisco was forcing people to join its
Cloud service through an update for it's consumer level routers.
>
>
http://www.neowin.net/news/cisco-locks-users-out-of-their-routers-requires-invasive-cloud-service
>
> -Mario Eirea
