[154086] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Jun 25 14:27:09 2012
In-Reply-To: <4FE8A6B0.6010408@mail-abuse.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:26:14 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org> wrote:
> The Internet should use more than port 80 and port 443. =A0Is extending
> entrenched TCP cruft really taking the Internet to a better and safer
> place?
isn't the 'internet should use more than 80/443' really: "Some
compelling use case should be found for more than 2 ports" ? Or
perhaps more clearly: "What application is written that is getting
wide appeal and uses more than 80/443?"
(aside from edonkey which Arbor always shows as a huge user of bandwidth)
-chris
(btw, it would be nice to use more ports, if there are applications
and users of said applications that want to do that...)
