[154095] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Multi-homing (was IPv6 /64 links)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Tue Jun 26 01:34:02 2012
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:33:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQLbGjxASySX-nQUEeSyDYyRF3W4AEZx50dEQ5VFm+Xyw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> SCTP is coming along, and it has a lot of promise.
Doesn't SCTP "suffer" from the same problem as SHIM6 was said to be
suffering from, ie that now all of a sudden end systems control where
packets go and there is going to be a bunch of people on this list
complaining that they no longer can do "traffic engineering"?
I don't mind. I wish more would use SCTP so it would get wider use. I also
wish <http://mosh.mit.edu/> would have used SCTP instead of trying to
invent that part again (the transport part of it at least).
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
