[153831] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: very confusing.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Charles Morris)
Wed Jun 13 18:47:42 2012
In-Reply-To: <20120613223405.1A02A218F201@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:47:37 -0400
From: Charles Morris <cmorris@cs.odu.edu>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Don't get me wrong, I greatly dislike spam, but next thing you know it
will be against the law to send packets to someone you don't have
consent from...
or hand out pamphlets / talk to someone on the street you don't have
consent from...
I figure the solution here that fits with the best interests of the
people, or really with any internet problem,
is a defensive or cryptographic one; instead of an offensive or
law-based punitive solution.
e.g. Requiring proof-of-work headers for email that doesn't want a
speedy descent into /dev/null
