[153426] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ROVER routing security - its not enumeration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Jun 5 23:13:06 2012
In-Reply-To: <CAGQUKcd=1fwvdtP=MetVg_Lvh7sHtizz4YJi+1kYm_R6UWOFPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 23:12:25 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Tony Tauber <ttauber@1-4-5.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, Daniel Massey <massey@cs.colostate.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Tony Tauber <ttauber@1-4-5.net> wrote:
> Shane A. gave a Lightning Talk the slides for which will be posted at som=
e
> time soon.
I figured the talk was shane's.
> They came in at the last minute which is why they're not up already.
>
ok, cool. thanks
-chris
> Tony
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.c=
om>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Daniel Massey <massey@cs.colostate.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > ROVER is not trying to do exactly what RPKI is doing. =A0Much of this
>> > seems to be an
>> > attempt to build a form of enumeration into ROVER. =A0 =A0See the Leve=
l3
>> > NANOG talk
>> > from Monday (6/4/12) for a concrete example of a different model.
>> > =A0There are many different
>>
>> you referenced this a few times:
>> =A0<http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog55/agenda.php>
>>
>> doesn't mention a talk from L3 on 6/4 ... got link?
>>
>> -chris
>>
>
