[153407] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ROVER routing security - its not enumeration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Tauber)
Tue Jun 5 17:40:10 2012
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabSFkKrapi1Lu82OkqHHwBSLAy04XWWxF13FPaPxjdR2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:39:31 -0400
From: Tony Tauber <ttauber@1-4-5.net>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, Daniel Massey <massey@cs.colostate.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Shane A. gave a Lightning Talk the slides for which will be posted at some
time soon.
They came in at the last minute which is why they're not up already.
Tony
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.lists@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Daniel Massey <massey@cs.colostate.edu>
> wrote:
>
>
> > ROVER is not trying to do exactly what RPKI is doing. Much of this
> seems to be an
> > attempt to build a form of enumeration into ROVER. See the Level3
> NANOG talk
> > from Monday (6/4/12) for a concrete example of a different model.
> There are many different
>
> you referenced this a few times:
> <http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog55/agenda.php>
>
> doesn't mention a talk from L3 on 6/4 ... got link?
>
> -chris
>
>
