[152997] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri May 25 18:17:21 2012
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 26 May 2012 06:44:58 +0900."
<4FBFFD5A.6020304@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
From: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 18:16:09 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1337984169_1898P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, 26 May 2012 06:44:58 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
> An IPv4 home address may be shared by many mobile
> terminals distinguished by port numbers, which is
> why IPv6 is not necessary.
An IPv4 address can also be shared by many mobile terminals
distinguished by AOL userids. How did that work out?
--==_Exmh_1337984169_1898P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=xDYg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1337984169_1898P--
