[153003] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arturo Servin)
Sat May 26 08:38:25 2012
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FC0BF7B.1020304@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 09:37:43 -0300
To: Matt Ryanczak <ryanczak@gmail.com>
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 26 May 2012, at 08:33, Matt Ryanczak wrote:
> On 5/25/12 2:35 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
>>=20
>> I wouldn't be so picky to have an static IP address in my phone, =
bur for sure I want a global IPvx one.
>=20
> but would you want that dynamic IP address behind layers of NAT, ALG,
> etc. or open and accessible?
>=20
Not at all.
I want to be free.
=09
-as
