[152990] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arturo Servin)
Fri May 25 14:36:23 2012
From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaY-8DuWruzgtroRi5YxgWVHeAuvGZV-k6ff6e_FkiUNgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:35:36 -0300
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I wouldn't be so picky to have an static IP address in my phone, =
bur for sure I want a global IPvx one.
-as
On 25 May 2012, at 15:00, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> =
wrote:
>> On 5/25/12 07:35 , valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>=20
>>> And the 80% of the world's population that can afford exactly one
>>> device which happens to be mobile, does, what, exactly?
>>=20
>> the utlitiy of a static ip is probably lost on someone with only a
>> mobile phone...
>=20
> END-2-END!!!
