[152949] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISPs and full packet inspection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (not common)
Thu May 24 09:33:15 2012
In-Reply-To: <37503.1337865882@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:32:05 -0400
From: not common <notcommonmistakes@gmail.com>
To: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thank you all, this will get me started and @Hammer, I see the trend your
talking about.
Cheers,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:24 AM, <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:13:16 -0400, not common said:
> > Thanks guys, I am looking for stuff to bring to my legal team (which is
> one
> > guy, that can't spell IP) and VPs.
>
> You probably want to fix that legal team. If you're an ISP and your legal
> eagle
> doesn't understand networking, you're opening yourself up to a world of
> hurt.
>
> > There has to be some thing out there or is this really a hands of topic?
>
> There's a whole mess of applicable laws. Patrick Darden just posed a good
> intro as I was writing this.
>
