[152948] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISPs and full packet inspection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu May 24 09:26:19 2012
To: not common <notcommonmistakes@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 May 2012 09:13:16 -0400."
<CAKF9zbBoWQ8sqBZNThXaW0Vw6YjjMO80eg3E5O5=vHq35yv3xw@mail.gmail.com>
From: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:24:42 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1337865882_35437P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:13:16 -0400, not common said:
> Thanks guys, I am looking for stuff to bring to my legal team (which is one
> guy, that can't spell IP) and VPs.
You probably want to fix that legal team. If you're an ISP and your legal eagle
doesn't understand networking, you're opening yourself up to a world of hurt.
> There has to be some thing out there or is this really a hands of topic?
There's a whole mess of applicable laws. Patrick Darden just posed a good
intro as I was writing this.
--==_Exmh_1337865882_35437P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=eBwZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1337865882_35437P--
