[152886] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue May 22 22:25:47 2012
In-Reply-To: <4FBC49AC.40308@derekivey.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:25:14 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Derek Ivey <derek@derekivey.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Derek Ivey <derek@derekivey.com> wrote:
> Verizon still seems to be quiet about their IPv6 plans for their FiOS
> network too :(.
no they aren't, their complete lack of any noise is their plan.
no plan.
joy.
> On 5/22/2012 10:18 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
>>
>> I suppose they are selectively letting certain devices in some areas. I
>> get "der duh, what?" when I ask about it.
>>
>> It certainly does not work on the iPad "3" in Ohio. Not only that, but I
>> can't even pay them to give me a stable IPv4 address, because if you get=
a
>> static IP, it disables the hotspot functionality. Head-->Wall.
>>
>> thanks,
>> -Randy
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Randy Carpenter
>>> <rcarpen@network1.net> =A0wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Not only does Verizon *not* have IPv6 on their LTE network, they
>>>> also do *not* have IPv4, except for double-NATed rfc1918 crap that
>>>> changes your IP address every couple minutes. The only way to get
>>>> a stable connection is to pay them $500 to get a static public IP
>>>> address.
>>>>
>>> wierd, I could swear someone in my office with a galaxy-nexus-on-vzw
>>> was able to browse some ipv6-only sites.
>>>
>>>
>
>
