[152885] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Derek Ivey)
Tue May 22 22:22:47 2012
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:21:32 -0400
From: Derek Ivey <derek@derekivey.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <b0382b3e-a003-49ca-8933-1d6d1a2e070b@zimbra.network1.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Verizon still seems to be quiet about their IPv6 plans for their FiOS
network too :(.
Derek
On 5/22/2012 10:18 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> I suppose they are selectively letting certain devices in some areas. I get "der duh, what?" when I ask about it.
>
> It certainly does not work on the iPad "3" in Ohio. Not only that, but I can't even pay them to give me a stable IPv4 address, because if you get a static IP, it disables the hotspot functionality. Head-->Wall.
>
> thanks,
> -Randy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Randy Carpenter
>> <rcarpen@network1.net> wrote:
>>> Not only does Verizon *not* have IPv6 on their LTE network, they
>>> also do *not* have IPv4, except for double-NATed rfc1918 crap that
>>> changes your IP address every couple minutes. The only way to get
>>> a stable connection is to pay them $500 to get a static public IP
>>> address.
>>>
>> wierd, I could swear someone in my office with a galaxy-nexus-on-vzw
>> was able to browse some ipv6-only sites.
>>
>>
